Compare
UserVane vs Simplesat
Simplesat is helpdesk-native: it surveys on ticket close, writes the score back onto the ticket, and gives support agents dashboards inside Zendesk, Gorgias, and similar tools. UserVane is for product and platform teams: an in-product widget, hosted links, and agent-native feedback, with honest scores and a free tier.
The real question is where your feedback lives. If it lives on support tickets, Simplesat's native helpdesk workflow is the product. If it lives in your software and your AI-agent conversations, that is UserVane. We do not fabricate Simplesat's prices or feature lists; UserVane's claims match what is built today.
How the approaches differ
Stable differences
| Simplesat (approach) | UserVane | |
|---|---|---|
| Where feedback lives | On the support ticket | In the product and the agent loop |
| Helpdesk integration | Native (Zendesk, Gorgias, and more) | Webhook + MCP; native helpdesk app not built |
| Survey shape | Multi-question with conditional logic | One question by design + optional follow-up |
| AI on your feedback | Vendor AI features | None by us; connect your own AI via MCP, no black-box summary |
| Agent-native feedback (AI conversations) | Not the focus | First-class, tied to the agent run |
| Honest thin-sample handling | Product-dependent | Built-in suppress + margin |
| Free tier | Product-dependent | Yes, monthly responses, no card |
How to choose
- Choose Simplesat when your feedback lives on support tickets and you want native helpdesk workflow, scores on the ticket, and agent dashboards.
- Choose UserVane when you measure product and AI-agent experience, want honest scores and a free tier, and want your own AI to read raw verbatims rather than a black-box summary.
Related: all guides · agent-native feedback · moving from Delighted.
Where UserVane fits
UserVane is the honest in-product NPS/CSAT/CES/PMF tool for product teams: suppress thin samples and show the plus/minus margin (never a vanity number), a native widget, hosted link surveys, bring-your-own email, React components, self-serve full-fidelity import, event and trait targeting on the entry paid tier, webhooks, verbatim tagging, WorkOS team invites and roles, MCP access after OAuth, and response metering with unlimited surveys.
A standalone microsurvey product with a real free tier, not a research platform and not an analytics suite you have to adopt first. Pro for volume and channels; Scale for team access and advanced analytics (segmentation, trends, cross-survey, honest per-segment scoring).
Deliberately different: one honest question by design for higher response rates, a score that always carries its sample size and margin, and no black-box AI over your feedback. Connect your own AI through MCP to read raw verbatims; we never summarize them into a claim you did not make.
Questions
Does UserVane integrate natively with Zendesk or Gorgias?
Not with a native helpdesk app today. UserVane sends responses over webhooks and exposes them through MCP, and is built for in-product and agent feedback rather than ticket CSAT. A native helpdesk app would be a demand-gated follow-up.
Does UserVane summarize verbatims with AI?
No. UserVane never runs a language model over your feedback or turns verbatims into a claim you did not make. You connect your own AI through MCP to read the raw responses. Scores stay honest, with the sample size and margin shown.
Start with honest in-product surveys. Free tier, Pro and Scale for volume.